AdvertisementRemove ads — go Premium
Combat Edge Intelligence

Sebastian Wies vs Zarrukh Adashev

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

2-0-0Record4-4-0
FlyweightDivisionFlyweight
5'6"Height5'7"
-Reach65"
125 lbsWeight125 lbs

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Sebastian WiesNow 1551
If they win+24→ 1575
If they lose-24→ 1527
Zarrukh AdashevNow 1549
If they win+24→ 1573
If they lose-24→ 1525

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1500 · 2 fightsPre-fight Elo1565 · 9 fights

Tracked stat edges

Tracked UFC statistics may not cover a fighter's full career. Unavailable measurements are not zero.

Not available
Sig. strikes / min
3.65
Not available
Strike accuracy
40%
Not available
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.04
Not available
Strike defense
65%
Not available
Takedown avg.
0
Not available
Takedown accuracy
0%
Not available
Takedown defense
100%
Not available
Submission avg.
0.48

Trajectory

Sebastian WiesZarrukh Adashev
15502026

Win method breakdown

1 (50%)
KO/TKO
2 (50%)
0 (0%)
Submission
0 (0%)
1 (50%)
Decision
2 (50%)

Combat Edge model read

Sebastian Wies54%
Zarrukh Adashev 46%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Sebastian Wies a 54% favorite over Zarrukh Adashev in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1551 vs 1549), separated by just 2 points.

Sebastian Wies enters on a 2-fight win streak.

Zarrukh Adashev 50%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.