Combat Edge Intelligence

Adam Wieczorek vs Tanner Boser

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Tanner Boser
ca

Tanner Boser

“The Bulldozer”

22-11-1Light HeavyweightUFC

1656Good

Tale of the tape

11-3-0Record22-11-1
HeavyweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
6'5"Height6'2"
46,0"Reach75"
232 lbsWeight203 lbs
AKS ChorzowTeamShaved Bears MMA

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Adam WieczorekNow 1659
If they win+16→ 1675
If they lose-16→ 1643
Tanner BoserNow 1656
If they win+12→ 1668
If they lose-12→ 1644

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1543 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1635 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

1.68
Sig. strikes / min
4.70
39%
Strike accuracy
53%
1.87
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.75
49%
Strike defense
58%
0.41
Takedown avg.
0
33%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
59%
Takedown defense
63%
0.41
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Adam WieczorekTanner Boser
165017002023202420252026

Win method breakdown

4 (36%)
KO/TKO
12 (55%)
6 (55%)
Submission
2 (9%)
1 (9%)
Decision
8 (36%)

Combat Edge model read

Tanner Boser52%
Adam Wieczorek 48%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Tanner Boser a 52% favorite over Adam Wieczorek in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Adam Wieczorek's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1659 vs 1656), separated by just 3 points.

Adam Wieczorek finishes 91% of wins inside the distance, Tanner Boser 64%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.