Combat Edge Intelligence

Ariane Lipski da Silva vs Isabela de Padua

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

18-12-0Record7-5-0
FlyweightDivisionStrawweight
5'6"Height5'4"
67"Reach36,0"
125 lbsWeight115 lbs
Lioness MMATeamTeam Nikolai MMA

What's at stake

Ariane Lipski da Silva is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +9 while a loss costs more — Isabela de Padua carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Ariane Lipski da SilvaNow 1634
If they win+9→ 1643
If they lose-15→ 1619
Isabela de PaduaNow 1532
If they win+21→ 1553
If they lose-11→ 1521

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1636 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1513 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

4.05
Sig. strikes / min
1
41%
Strike accuracy
36%
4.40
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.07
51%
Strike defense
51%
0.47
Takedown avg.
2
38%
Takedown accuracy
67%
68%
Takedown defense
0%
0.28
Submission avg.
1

Trajectory

Ariane Lipski da SilvaIsabela de Padua
1550160016502023202420252026

Win method breakdown

6 (33%)
KO/TKO
2 (29%)
4 (22%)
Submission
3 (43%)
8 (44%)
Decision
2 (29%)

Combat Edge model read

Ariane Lipski da Silva67%
Isabela de Padua 33%Elo baseline: 64%

The Combat Edge model makes Ariane Lipski da Silva a 67% favorite over Isabela de Padua in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (64%).

Ariane Lipski da Silva holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1634 to 1532, a 102-point edge.

Isabela de Padua enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Ariane Lipski da Silva finishes 56% of wins inside the distance, Isabela de Padua 71%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.