Combat Edge Intelligence

Blood Diamond vs Dan Stittgen

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Blood Diamond
zw

Blood Diamond

“Blood Diamond”

3-5-0WelterweightHEX

1460Average
Dan Stittgen
us

Dan Stittgen

“The Anvil”

12-9-0WelterweightCAMMA

1454Average

Tale of the tape

3-5-0Record12-9-0
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
5'11"Height6'1"
76"ReachTBD
170 lbsWeight170 lbs
City KickboxingTeamMidwest Training Center

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Blood DiamondNow 1460
If they win+24→ 1484
If they lose-24→ 1436
Dan StittgenNow 1454
If they win+24→ 1478
If they lose-24→ 1430

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1546 · 8 fightsPre-fight Elo1601 · 6 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.12
Sig. strikes / min
2.97
55%
Strike accuracy
46%
2.17
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
4.42
49%
Strike defense
37%
0
Takedown avg.
0.78
0%
Takedown accuracy
100%
74%
Takedown defense
100%
0
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Blood DiamondDan Stittgen
145015001550202020212022202320242025

Win method breakdown

1 (33%)
KO/TKO
2 (17%)
1 (33%)
Submission
9 (75%)
1 (33%)
Decision
1 (8%)

Combat Edge model read

The Combat Edge model rates this a near coin-flip, splitting Blood Diamond and Dan Stittgen within a point of even.

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1460 vs 1454), separated by just 6 points.

Blood Diamond enters on a 5-fight loss streak.

Blood Diamond finishes 67% of wins inside the distance, Dan Stittgen 92%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.