Combat Edge Intelligence

Chad Mendes vs William Gomis

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Chad Mendes
us

Chad Mendes

“Money”

18-5-0FeatherweightUFC

1707Good

Tale of the tape

18-5-0Record15-4-0
FeatherweightDivisionFeatherweight
5'6"Height6'0"
66"Reach73"
145 lbsWeight145 lbs
Team Alpha MaleTeamMMA Factory

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Chad MendesNow 1707
If they win+16→ 1723
If they lose-16→ 1691
William GomisNow 1707
If they win+16→ 1723
If they lose-16→ 1691

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1724 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1632 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.78
Sig. strikes / min
3.48
50%
Strike accuracy
50%
2.35
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.76
67%
Strike defense
61%
4.13
Takedown avg.
0.86
56%
Takedown accuracy
38%
100%
Takedown defense
72%
0.28
Submission avg.
0.34

Trajectory

Chad MendesWilliam Gomis
170020192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

8 (44%)
KO/TKO
7 (47%)
2 (11%)
Submission
1 (7%)
8 (44%)
Decision
7 (47%)

Combat Edge model read

William Gomis70%
Chad Mendes 30%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes William Gomis a 70% favorite over Chad Mendes in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Chad Mendes's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1707 vs 1707), separated by just 0 points.

Chad Mendes finishes 56% of wins inside the distance, William Gomis 53%.

William Gomis carries a 7-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.