Combat Edge Intelligence

Dan Argueta vs Ronnie Lawrence

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Dan Argueta
us

Dan Argueta

“The Determined”

9-3-0BantamweightUFC

1630Solid

Tale of the tape

9-3-0Record8-2-0
BantamweightDivisionBantamweight
5'7"Height5'8"
68"Reach68"
135 lbsWeight135 lbs
Jackson-Wink MMATeamMMA Science Academy

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Dan ArguetaNow 1630
If they win+16→ 1646
If they lose-16→ 1614
Ronnie LawrenceNow 1636
If they win+24→ 1660
If they lose-24→ 1612

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1607 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1570 · 9 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.48
Sig. strikes / min
2.78
43%
Strike accuracy
56%
3.44
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
1.75
51%
Strike defense
52%
4.36
Takedown avg.
6.75
36%
Takedown accuracy
77%
56%
Takedown defense
45%
1.45
Submission avg.
0.25

Trajectory

Dan ArguetaRonnie Lawrence
160016502021202220232024

Win method breakdown

2 (22%)
KO/TKO
4 (50%)
4 (44%)
Submission
0 (0%)
3 (33%)
Decision
4 (50%)

Combat Edge model read

Ronnie Lawrence62%
Dan Argueta 38%Elo baseline: 51%

The Combat Edge model makes Ronnie Lawrence a 62% favorite over Dan Argueta in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (51%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1630 vs 1636), separated by just 6 points.

Dan Argueta enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Dan Argueta finishes 67% of wins inside the distance, Ronnie Lawrence 50%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.