Combat Edge Intelligence

Daniel Pineda vs Jackson Glass

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

28-17-0Record4-0-0
FeatherweightDivisionFeatherweight
5'7"Height5'11"
69"Reach72"
145 lbsWeight145 lbs
4oz. Fight ClubTeamAmbush Muay Thai

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Daniel PinedaNow 1593
If they win+12→ 1605
If they lose-12→ 1581
Jackson GlassNow 1595
If they win+24→ 1619
If they lose-24→ 1571

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1608 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1490 · 4 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.85
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
50%
Strike accuracy
TBD
3.26
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
46%
Strike defense
TBD
1.42
Takedown avg.
TBD
24%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
55%
Takedown defense
TBD
1.54
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Daniel PinedaJackson Glass
15501600202420252026

Win method breakdown

9 (32%)
KO/TKO
2 (50%)
19 (68%)
Submission
1 (25%)
0 (0%)
Decision
1 (25%)

Combat Edge model read

Jackson Glass89%
Daniel Pineda 11%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Jackson Glass a 89% favorite over Daniel Pineda in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1593 vs 1595), separated by just 2 points.

Daniel Pineda enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Jackson Glass enters on a 4-fight win streak.

Daniel Pineda finishes 100% of wins inside the distance, Jackson Glass 75%.

Jackson Glass carries a 3-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.