Combat Edge Intelligence

David Onama vs Josh Emmett

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
David Onama
us

David Onama

“Silent Assassin”

14-3-0FeatherweightUFC

1713Good

Tale of the tape

14-3-0Record19-7-0
FeatherweightDivisionFeatherweight
5'10"Height5'6"
74"Reach70"
149 lbsWeight145 lbs
Factory XTeamTeam Alpha Male

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

David OnamaNow 1713
If they win+16→ 1729
If they lose-16→ 1697
Josh EmmettNow 1712
If they win+12→ 1724
If they lose-12→ 1700

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1640 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1753 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

5.24
Sig. strikes / min
3.72
51%
Strike accuracy
36%
4.73
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
4.43
52%
Strike defense
60%
1.08
Takedown avg.
1.08
30%
Takedown accuracy
38%
53%
Takedown defense
44%
0.46
Submission avg.
0.07

Trajectory

David OnamaJosh Emmett
17001750202420252026

Win method breakdown

7 (50%)
KO/TKO
7 (37%)
4 (29%)
Submission
2 (11%)
3 (21%)
Decision
10 (53%)

Combat Edge model read

David Onama63%
Josh Emmett 37%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes David Onama a 63% favorite over Josh Emmett in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1713 vs 1712), separated by just 1 points.

Josh Emmett enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

David Onama finishes 79% of wins inside the distance, Josh Emmett 47%.

David Onama carries a 4-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.