Combat Edge Intelligence

Giacomo Lemos vs Gokhan Saricam

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

8-0-0Record12-2-0
HeavyweightDivisionHeavyweight
6'3"Height6'3"
TBDReach76"
247 lbsWeight246 lbs
RFATeamMMA Vlaardingen

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Giacomo LemosNow 1663
If they win+24→ 1687
If they lose-24→ 1639
Gokhan SaricamNow 1663
If they win+16→ 1679
If they lose-16→ 1647

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1484 · 8 fightsPre-fight Elo1543 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

0
Sig. strikes / min
0
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Giacomo LemosGokhan Saricam
160016502020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

6 (75%)
KO/TKO
8 (67%)
2 (25%)
Submission
1 (8%)
0 (0%)
Decision
3 (25%)

Combat Edge model read

Gokhan Saricam66%
Giacomo Lemos 34%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Gokhan Saricam a 66% favorite over Giacomo Lemos in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Giacomo Lemos's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1663 vs 1663), separated by just 0 points.

Giacomo Lemos enters on a 8-fight win streak.

Gokhan Saricam enters on a 4-fight win streak.

Giacomo Lemos finishes 100% of wins inside the distance, Gokhan Saricam 75%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.