Combat Edge Intelligence

Jackson McVey vs Zach Reese

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Zach Reese
us

Zach Reese

“Savage”

10-4-0MiddleweightUFC

1645Solid

Tale of the tape

8-2-0Record10-4-0
MiddleweightDivisionMiddleweight
6'4"Height6'3"
77"Reach77"
185 lbsWeight185 lbs
St. Charles MMATeamW4R Training Center· 1623 avg Elo · 4 rated

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Jackson McVeyNow 1651
If they win+16→ 1667
If they lose-16→ 1635
Zach ReeseNow 1645
If they win+16→ 1661
If they lose-16→ 1629

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1554 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1620 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

6.51
Sig. strikes / min
4.48
69%
Strike accuracy
54%
3.37
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.92
24%
Strike defense
44%
0
Takedown avg.
2.80
0%
Takedown accuracy
61%
0%
Takedown defense
52%
1.20
Submission avg.
1.27

Trajectory

Jackson McVeyZach Reese
16001650202420252026

Win method breakdown

4 (50%)
KO/TKO
5 (50%)
4 (50%)
Submission
3 (30%)
0 (0%)
Decision
2 (20%)

Combat Edge model read

Jackson McVey64%
Zach Reese 36%Elo baseline: 51%

The Combat Edge model makes Jackson McVey a 64% favorite over Zach Reese in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (51%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1651 vs 1645), separated by just 6 points.

Jackson McVey enters on a 2-fight win streak.

Zach Reese enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Jackson McVey finishes 100% of wins inside the distance, Zach Reese 80%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.