Combat Edge Intelligence

Jamall Emmers vs Nate Landwehr

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

22-8-0Record18-8-0
FeatherweightDivisionFeatherweight
5'10"Height5'9"
74"Reach72"
145 lbsWeight145 lbs
Pinnacle MMATeamMMA Masters

What's at stake

Jamall Emmers is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +10 while a loss costs more — Nate Landwehr carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Jamall EmmersNow 1695
If they win+10→ 1705
If they lose-14→ 1681
Nate LandwehrNow 1640
If they win+19→ 1659
If they lose-13→ 1627

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1649 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1677 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

5.45
Sig. strikes / min
5.63
49%
Strike accuracy
46%
4.07
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
5.83
57%
Strike defense
52%
1.74
Takedown avg.
0.76
41%
Takedown accuracy
42%
80%
Takedown defense
72%
0.19
Submission avg.
0.76

Trajectory

Jamall EmmersNate Landwehr
16501700202420252026

Win method breakdown

9 (41%)
KO/TKO
9 (50%)
3 (14%)
Submission
2 (11%)
10 (45%)
Decision
7 (39%)

Combat Edge model read

Jamall Emmers66%
Nate Landwehr 34%Elo baseline: 58%

The Combat Edge model makes Jamall Emmers a 66% favorite over Nate Landwehr in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (58%).

Jamall Emmers holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1695 to 1640, a 55-point edge.

Jamall Emmers enters on a 2-fight win streak.

Nate Landwehr enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Jamall Emmers finishes 55% of wins inside the distance, Nate Landwehr 61%.

Jamall Emmers carries a 2-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.