Combat Edge Intelligence

Jared Hamman vs Magnus Cedenblad

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Jared Hamman
us

Jared Hamman

“The Messenger”

14-6-0Light HeavyweightWSOF

1619Solid

Tale of the tape

14-6-0Record14-5-0
Light HeavyweightDivisionMiddleweight
6'3"Height6'3"
TBDReach79,0"
205 lbsWeight185 lbs
Dynamix MMATeamAllstars Training Center

What's at stake

Magnus Cedenblad is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +14 while a loss costs more — Jared Hamman carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Jared HammanNow 1619
If they win+18→ 1637
If they lose-14→ 1605
Magnus CedenbladNow 1654
If they win+14→ 1668
If they lose-18→ 1636

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1589 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1592 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

5.52
Sig. strikes / min
2.38
41%
Strike accuracy
51%
4.44
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.02
55%
Strike defense
40%
0.59
Takedown avg.
2.87
22%
Takedown accuracy
64%
31%
Takedown defense
67%
0
Submission avg.
0.96

Trajectory

Jared HammanMagnus Cedenblad
1600165020122013201420152016

Win method breakdown

11 (79%)
KO/TKO
7 (50%)
2 (14%)
Submission
5 (36%)
1 (7%)
Decision
2 (14%)

Combat Edge model read

Magnus Cedenblad68%
Jared Hamman 32%Elo baseline: 55%

The Combat Edge model makes Magnus Cedenblad a 68% favorite over Jared Hamman in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (55%).

Magnus Cedenblad holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1654 to 1619, a 35-point edge.

Jared Hamman finishes 93% of wins inside the distance, Magnus Cedenblad 86%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.