Combat Edge Intelligence

Jon Tuck vs Josh Emmett

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Jon Tuck
gu

Jon Tuck

“Super Saiyan”

11-5-0LightweightBFC

1627Solid

Tale of the tape

11-5-0Record19-7-0
LightweightDivisionFeatherweight
5'11"Height5'6"
73,0"Reach70"
155 lbsWeight145 lbs
Kings MMATeamTeam Alpha Male

What's at stake

Josh Emmett is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +9 while a loss costs more — Jon Tuck carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Jon TuckNow 1627
If they win+20→ 1647
If they lose-12→ 1615
Josh EmmettNow 1712
If they win+9→ 1721
If they lose-15→ 1697

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1616 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1753 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3
Sig. strikes / min
3.72
40%
Strike accuracy
36%
3.74
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
4.43
61%
Strike defense
60%
0.42
Takedown avg.
1.08
33%
Takedown accuracy
38%
50%
Takedown defense
44%
0.97
Submission avg.
0.07

Trajectory

Jon TuckJosh Emmett
1600165017001750201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

5 (45%)
KO/TKO
7 (37%)
5 (45%)
Submission
2 (11%)
1 (9%)
Decision
10 (53%)

Combat Edge model read

Josh Emmett75%
Jon Tuck 25%Elo baseline: 62%

The Combat Edge model makes Josh Emmett a 75% favorite over Jon Tuck in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (62%).

Josh Emmett holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1712 to 1627, a 85-point edge.

Josh Emmett enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Jon Tuck finishes 91% of wins inside the distance, Josh Emmett 47%.

Jon Tuck carries a 3-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.