Combat Edge Intelligence

Joselyne Edwards vs Larissa Pacheco

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

18-6-0Record23-4-0
BantamweightDivisionFeatherweight
5'6"Height5'8"
70"Reach69.00"
135 lbsWeight145 lbs
Kings MMA· 1672 avg Elo · 7 ratedTeamJoao Bastos Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Joselyne EdwardsNow 1707
If they win+16→ 1723
If they lose-16→ 1691
Larissa PachecoNow 1712
If they win+12→ 1724
If they lose-12→ 1700

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1615 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1575 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

4.61
Sig. strikes / min
1.21
54%
Strike accuracy
19%
3.24
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
4.14
50%
Strike defense
56%
1.43
Takedown avg.
0
40%
Takedown accuracy
0%
61%
Takedown defense
0%
0.61
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Joselyne EdwardsLarissa Pacheco
165017002023202420252026

Win method breakdown

8 (44%)
KO/TKO
11 (48%)
4 (22%)
Submission
8 (35%)
6 (33%)
Decision
4 (17%)

Combat Edge model read

Joselyne Edwards63%
Larissa Pacheco 37%Elo baseline: 49%

The Combat Edge model makes Joselyne Edwards a 63% favorite over Larissa Pacheco in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Larissa Pacheco's way (49%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1707 vs 1712), separated by just 5 points.

Joselyne Edwards enters on a 5-fight win streak.

Joselyne Edwards finishes 67% of wins inside the distance, Larissa Pacheco 83%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.