Combat Edge Intelligence

Kelvin Gastelum vs Ryan Gandra

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Ryan Gandra
br

Ryan Gandra

“Problema”

10-1-0MiddleweightUFC

1695Good

Tale of the tape

20-11-0Record10-1-0
MiddleweightDivisionMiddleweight
5'9"Height6'1"
71"Reach74"
185 lbsWeight184 lbs
Fight ReadyTeamFlavio Baiano Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Kelvin GastelumNow 1693
If they win+12→ 1705
If they lose-12→ 1681
Ryan GandraNow 1695
If they win+16→ 1711
If they lose-16→ 1679

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1715 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1524 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.65
Sig. strikes / min
11.71
42%
Strike accuracy
50%
3.52
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.30
57%
Strike defense
74%
1.04
Takedown avg.
0
13%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
60%
Takedown defense
100%
0.09
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Kelvin GastelumRyan Gandra
160016501700202420252026

Win method breakdown

6 (30%)
KO/TKO
7 (70%)
5 (25%)
Submission
1 (10%)
9 (45%)
Decision
2 (20%)

Combat Edge model read

Ryan Gandra60%
Kelvin Gastelum 40%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Ryan Gandra a 60% favorite over Kelvin Gastelum in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1693 vs 1695), separated by just 2 points.

Ryan Gandra enters on a 9-fight win streak.

Kelvin Gastelum finishes 55% of wins inside the distance, Ryan Gandra 80%.

Ryan Gandra carries a 3-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.