Combat Edge Intelligence

Priscila Cachoeira vs Taneisha Tennant

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

13-9-0Record5-2-0
BantamweightDivisionBantamweight
5'7"Height5'7"
65"ReachTBD
134 lbsWeight135 lbs
MMA MastersTeamBudokan Martial Arts Academy

What's at stake

Taneisha Tennant is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +23 while a loss costs more — Priscila Cachoeira carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Priscila CachoeiraNow 1544
If they win+17→ 1561
If they lose-15→ 1529
Taneisha TennantNow 1562
If they win+23→ 1585
If they lose-25→ 1537

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1613 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1518 · 7 fights

Tracked stat edges

4.43
Sig. strikes / min
5.67
44%
Strike accuracy
56%
7.60
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.40
46%
Strike defense
72%
0.25
Takedown avg.
0
40%
Takedown accuracy
0%
70%
Takedown defense
100%
0
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Priscila CachoeiraTaneisha Tennant
15501600202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

8 (62%)
KO/TKO
1 (20%)
0 (0%)
Submission
0 (0%)
5 (38%)
Decision
4 (80%)

Combat Edge model read

Taneisha Tennant60%
Priscila Cachoeira 40%Elo baseline: 53%

The Combat Edge model makes Taneisha Tennant a 60% favorite over Priscila Cachoeira in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (53%).

Taneisha Tennant holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1562 to 1544, a 18-point edge.

Priscila Cachoeira enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Priscila Cachoeira finishes 62% of wins inside the distance, Taneisha Tennant 20%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.