Combat Edge Intelligence

Alessio Di Chirico vs Emile Vujakovic

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

13-7-0Record6-2-0
MiddleweightDivisionMiddleweight
6'0"Height6'0"
74"ReachTBD
185 lbsWeight186 lbs
Gloria Fight CenterTeamASW LPL

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Alessio Di ChiricoNow 1581
If they win+16→ 1597
If they lose-16→ 1565
Emile VujakovicNow 1580
If they win+24→ 1604
If they lose-24→ 1556

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1655 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1509 · 8 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.32
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
40%
Strike accuracy
TBD
3.44
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
62%
Strike defense
TBD
1.46
Takedown avg.
TBD
39%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
83%
Takedown defense
TBD
0
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Alessio Di ChiricoEmile Vujakovic
155016002020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

6 (46%)
KO/TKO
5 (83%)
4 (31%)
Submission
1 (17%)
3 (23%)
Decision
0 (0%)

Combat Edge model read

Emile Vujakovic60%
Alessio Di Chirico 40%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Emile Vujakovic a 60% favorite over Alessio Di Chirico in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Alessio Di Chirico's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1581 vs 1580), separated by just 1 points.

Alessio Di Chirico enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Alessio Di Chirico finishes 77% of wins inside the distance, Emile Vujakovic 100%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.