AdvertisementRemove ads — go Premium
Fighter comparison

Esteban Ribovics vs Mateusz Gamrot

Records, Elo, stats and the Combat Edge model read, side by side.

Combat Edge model read

Mateusz Gamrot62%
Esteban Ribovics 38%Elo baseline: 57%

The Combat Edge model makes Mateusz Gamrot a 62% favorite over Esteban Ribovics in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (57%).

Mateusz Gamrot holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1814 to 1762, a 52-point edge.

Esteban Ribovics enters on a 2-fight win streak.

Esteban Ribovics finishes 82% of wins inside the distance, Mateusz Gamrot 54%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.

Tale of the tape

17-3-0Record26-5-0
LightweightDivisionLightweight
5'10"Height5'10"
69"Reach70"
155 lbsWeight155 lbs
Kill Cliff FCTeamAmerican Top Team

What's at stake

Mateusz Gamrot is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +10 while a loss costs more — Esteban Ribovics carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Esteban RibovicsNow 1762
If they win+18→ 1780
If they lose-14→ 1748
Mateusz GamrotNow 1814
If they win+10→ 1824
If they lose-14→ 1800

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1694 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1753 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

Tracked UFC statistics may not cover a fighter's full career. Unavailable measurements are not zero.

7.43
Sig. strikes / min
3.21
44%
Strike accuracy
52%
5.74
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.81
54%
Strike defense
60%
0.32
Takedown avg.
5.22
0%
Takedown accuracy
9%
66%
Takedown defense
83%
0.16
Submission avg.
0.19

Trajectory

Esteban RibovicsMateusz Gamrot
175018001850202420252026

Win method breakdown

9 (53%)
KO/TKO
8 (31%)
5 (29%)
Submission
6 (23%)
3 (18%)
Decision
12 (46%)