Combat Edge Intelligence

Jack Shore vs Timur Valiev

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Jack Shore
gb-wls

Jack Shore

“Tank”

17-3-0FeatherweightUFC

1731Good

Tale of the tape

17-3-0Record19-4-0
FeatherweightDivisionFeatherweight
5'9"Height5'6"
71"Reach67"
145 lbsWeight138 lbs
Tillery Combat MMA AcademyTeamDagFighter

What's at stake

Jack Shore is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +15 while a loss costs more — Timur Valiev carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Jack ShoreNow 1731
If they win+15→ 1746
If they lose-17→ 1714
Timur ValievNow 1707
If they win+17→ 1724
If they lose-15→ 1692

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1661 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1562 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.60
Sig. strikes / min
5.19
58%
Strike accuracy
53%
2.31
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.33
56%
Strike defense
45%
3.22
Takedown avg.
1.73
40%
Takedown accuracy
40%
74%
Takedown defense
56%
0.61
Submission avg.
0.29

Trajectory

Jack ShoreTimur Valiev
17001750180020232024

Win method breakdown

4 (24%)
KO/TKO
5 (26%)
9 (53%)
Submission
2 (11%)
4 (24%)
Decision
12 (63%)

Combat Edge model read

Jack Shore66%
Timur Valiev 34%Elo baseline: 53%

The Combat Edge model makes Jack Shore a 66% favorite over Timur Valiev in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (53%).

Jack Shore holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1731 to 1707, a 24-point edge.

Jack Shore enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Jack Shore finishes 76% of wins inside the distance, Timur Valiev 37%.

Jack Shore carries a 4-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.