Combat Edge Intelligence

Jamal Pogues vs Mick Parkin

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Jamal Pogues
us

Jamal Pogues

“The Stormtrooper”

11-5-0HeavyweightUFC

1628Solid

Tale of the tape

11-5-0Record10-1-0
HeavyweightDivisionHeavyweight
6'2"Height6'3"
77"Reach 79"
266 lbsWeight263 lbs
Syndicate MMATeamUnit 1 Martial Arts and Fitness

What's at stake

Mick Parkin is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +12 while a loss costs more — Jamal Pogues carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Jamal PoguesNow 1628
If they win+20→ 1648
If they lose-12→ 1616
Mick ParkinNow 1709
If they win+12→ 1721
If they lose-20→ 1689

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1586 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1567 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.36
Sig. strikes / min
4.91
45%
Strike accuracy
53%
4.17
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
4.15
50%
Strike defense
58%
2.40
Takedown avg.
1.49
48%
Takedown accuracy
42%
78%
Takedown defense
50%
0
Submission avg.
0.30

Trajectory

Jamal PoguesMick Parkin
160016501700202320242025

Win method breakdown

4 (36%)
KO/TKO
6 (60%)
1 (9%)
Submission
1 (10%)
6 (55%)
Decision
3 (30%)

Combat Edge model read

Mick Parkin71%
Jamal Pogues 29%Elo baseline: 61%

The Combat Edge model makes Mick Parkin a 71% favorite over Jamal Pogues in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (61%).

Mick Parkin holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1709 to 1628, a 81-point edge.

Jamal Pogues finishes 45% of wins inside the distance, Mick Parkin 70%.

Mick Parkin carries a 2-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.