Combat Edge Intelligence

Jaqueline Amorim vs Mizuki Inoue

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

11-2-0Record16-6-0
StrawweightDivisionStrawweight
5'3"Height5'4"
68"Reach65"
116 lbsWeight115 lbs
American Top TeamTeamSerra-Longo Fight Team· 1771 avg Elo · 4 rated

What's at stake

Jaqueline Amorim is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +15 while a loss costs more — Mizuki Inoue carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Jaqueline AmorimNow 1703
If they win+15→ 1718
If they lose-17→ 1686
Mizuki InoueNow 1679
If they win+17→ 1696
If they lose-15→ 1664

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1574 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1581 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.43
Sig. strikes / min
4.56
51%
Strike accuracy
51%
2.16
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
5.62
55%
Strike defense
49%
2.16
Takedown avg.
0.33
36%
Takedown accuracy
14%
0%
Takedown defense
85%
3.78
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Jaqueline AmorimMizuki Inoue
16501700202420252026

Win method breakdown

2 (18%)
KO/TKO
0 (0%)
9 (82%)
Submission
9 (56%)
0 (0%)
Decision
7 (44%)

Combat Edge model read

Jaqueline Amorim63%
Mizuki Inoue 37%Elo baseline: 53%

The Combat Edge model makes Jaqueline Amorim a 63% favorite over Mizuki Inoue in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (53%).

Jaqueline Amorim holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1703 to 1679, a 24-point edge.

Mizuki Inoue enters on a 2-fight win streak.

Jaqueline Amorim finishes 100% of wins inside the distance, Mizuki Inoue 56%.

Jaqueline Amorim carries a 3-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.