Combat Edge Intelligence

Joaquim Silva vs Ricky Glenn

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Ricky Glenn
us

Ricky Glenn

“The Gladiator”

22-8-2LightweightUFC

1650Good

Tale of the tape

14-5-0Record22-8-2
LightweightDivisionLightweight
5'8"Height6'0"
69"Reach70.5"
155 lbsWeight155 lbs
American Top TeamTeamTeam Alpha Male

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Joaquim SilvaNow 1650
If they win+16→ 1666
If they lose-16→ 1634
Ricky GlennNow 1650
If they win+12→ 1662
If they lose-12→ 1638

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1677 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1670 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.66
Sig. strikes / min
3.79
43%
Strike accuracy
43%
4.53
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
4.30
53%
Strike defense
51%
0.39
Takedown avg.
0.72
50%
Takedown accuracy
13%
69%
Takedown defense
69%
0.78
Submission avg.
0.36

Trajectory

Joaquim SilvaRicky Glenn
165017002022202320242025

Win method breakdown

7 (50%)
KO/TKO
13 (59%)
3 (21%)
Submission
3 (14%)
4 (29%)
Decision
6 (27%)

Combat Edge model read

Joaquim Silva63%
Ricky Glenn 37%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Joaquim Silva a 63% favorite over Ricky Glenn in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1650 vs 1650), separated by just 0 points.

Ricky Glenn enters on a 4-fight loss streak.

Joaquim Silva finishes 71% of wins inside the distance, Ricky Glenn 73%.

Ricky Glenn carries a 2-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.