AdvertisementRemove ads — go Premium
ORTIZ VS SHAMROCK 3 : Tito Ortiz VS Ken Shamrock

Nate Marquardt vs Crafton Wallace

Oct 10, 2006
ResultNate Marquardt def. Crafton Wallace by Submission · Round 1 · 00:01:14Fight analysis
DateOct 10, 2006
DivisionMiddleweight
StatusCompleted
VenueSeminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino
BroadcastESPN+
W
The Great | 36-20-2Nate Marquardt

Nate Marquardt vs Crafton Wallace

Method :Submission
Round :1
Time :00:01:14
Time format :Pending
Referee :Pending
Details :Pending
Nate MarquardtThe Great |36-20-2Nate Marquardt vs Crafton WallaceCrafton Wallace18-6-1
usNate MarquardtThe Great36-20-2Nate Marquardtus

Fight Overview

Round1
Time00:01:14
MethodSubmission
usCrafton Wallace18-6-1usCrafton Wallace
Combat Edge Intelligence

Fight Intelligence

Nate Marquardt won this fight by Submission in round 1 at 00:01:14. Nate Marquardt led more tracked fight-stat categories from the recorded round totals. Attempt-rate stats such as 1 of 4 takedowns require attempt fields from the legacy API before Combat Edge can calculate them accurately.

Compare Nate Marquardt and Crafton Wallace across their careers →

Recent career Elo trajectory

Recent three-year Elo paths for both fighters. Ratings shown here are current career context; the event-specific prediction or verified result remains on this Fight page.

Nate MarquardtCrafton Wallace
16001650201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021

Result

Nate MarquardtSubmission
MethodSubmission
Round1
Time00:01:14
Elo swing-15Crafton Wallace (1616 → 1601)

Elo edge

Nate Marquardt1651-21 last move
Crafton Wallace1593-13 last move

Why they are ranked here

Nate MarquardtNot on the active ladder · 1651 Elo
Biggest gain
Beat Tamdan McCrory (rated 1661 at the time): +14.
Costliest loss
Lost to Valdir Araujo (rated 1485 at the time): -21.
Last 5 fights
1 win, 4 losses, -49 Elo in total.
Inactivity
Placed on 1561, not 1651: 90 points are held back after more than 18 months without a fight, until the next one.
Crafton WallaceNot on the active ladder · 1593 Elo
Biggest gain
Beat Steve Headden (rated 1504 at the time): +12.
Costliest loss
Lost to Reggie Orr (rated 1477 at the time): -23.
Last 5 fights
2 wins, 3 losses, -40 Elo in total.
Inactivity
Placed on 1503, not 1593: 90 points are held back after more than 18 months without a fight, until the next one.

Every rated fight moves a rating by an amount set by the opponent's rating at the time, the result and how it ended. Places are counted among fighters active in the last 24 months. How the rating is calculated

Recorded fight totals

Nate MarquardtvsCrafton Wallace
Sig. strikes
13vs4
Total strikes
31vs27
Takedowns
2vs0
Sub. attempts
2vs0
Rev.
1vs0

Finishing profile

Nate Marquardtsubmission leads 42% of wins
Crafton Wallacesubmission leads 50% of wins

Round stats

Nate MarquardtFight statsCrafton Wallace
31Total strikes27
2Takedowns0
2Sub. attempts0
1Rev.0
13Sig. strikes4
0Knockdowns0
0Control time0
31Total strikes27
2Takedowns0
2Sub. attempts0
1Rev.0
13Sig. strikes4
0Knockdowns0
0Control time0
0Total strikes0
0Takedowns0
0Sub. attempts0
0Rev.0
0Sig. strikes0
0Knockdowns0
0Control time0

Nate Marquardt vs Crafton Wallace is a completed Middleweight fight from ORTIZ VS SHAMROCK 3 : Tito Ortiz VS Ken Shamrock. Nate Marquardt defeated Crafton Wallace by Submission in round 1 at 00:01:14. Combat Edge lists the result, records, fight stats, Elo context, and links to both fighter profiles.

Nate Marquardt vs Crafton Wallace quick answers

Who won Nate Marquardt vs Crafton Wallace?

Nate Marquardt won Nate Marquardt vs Crafton Wallace by Submission in round 1 at 00:01:14.

What event is Nate Marquardt vs Crafton Wallace on?

Nate Marquardt vs Crafton Wallace is listed on ORTIZ VS SHAMROCK 3 : Tito Ortiz VS Ken Shamrock.

What are the records for Nate Marquardt vs Crafton Wallace?

Nate Marquardt enters with a 36-20-2 record and Crafton Wallace enters with a 18-6-1 record.

What division is Nate Marquardt vs Crafton Wallace?

Nate Marquardt vs Crafton Wallace is listed as a Middleweight fight.

Comments

Loading comments…