AdvertisementRemove ads — go Premium
UFC FIGHT NIGHT : SANCHEZ VS ELLENBERGER

Tim Means vs Bernardo Magalhaes

Feb 15, 2012
ResultTim Means def. Bernardo Magalhaes by Decision - Unanimous · Round 1 · 00:05:00Fight analysis
DateFeb 15, 2012
DivisionLightweight
StatusCompleted
VenueOmaha Civic Auditorium
BroadcastESPN+
W
The Dirty Bird | 33-17-1Tim Means
L
Trekko | 13-4-0Bernardo Magalhaes

Tim Means vs Bernardo Magalhaes

Method :Decision - Unanimous
Round :1
Time :00:05:00
Time format :Pending
Referee :Pending
Details :Pending
Tim MeansThe Dirty Bird |33-17-1Tim Means vs Bernardo MagalhaesBernardo MagalhaesTrekko |13-4-0
usTim MeansThe Dirty Bird33-17-1Tim Meansus

Fight Overview

Round1
Time00:05:00
MethodDecision - Unanimous
brBernardo MagalhaesTrekko13-4-0brBernardo Magalhaes
Combat Edge Intelligence

Fight Intelligence

Tim Means won this fight by Decision - Unanimous in round 1 at 00:05:00. Tim Means led more tracked fight-stat categories from the recorded round totals. Attempt-rate stats such as 1 of 4 takedowns require attempt fields from the legacy API before Combat Edge can calculate them accurately.

Compare Tim Means and Bernardo Magalhaes across their careers →

Recent career Elo trajectory

Recent three-year Elo paths for both fighters. Ratings shown here are current career context; the event-specific prediction or verified result remains on this Fight page.

Tim MeansBernardo Magalhaes
150016001700201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

Result

Tim MeansDecision - Unanimous
MethodDecision - Unanimous
Round1
Time00:05:00
Elo swing-14Bernardo Magalhaes (1500 → 1486)

Elo edge

Tim Means1645-18 last move
Bernardo Magalhaes1472-14 last move

Why they are ranked here

Tim MeansNot on the active ladder · 1645 Elo
Biggest gain
Beat Mike Perry (rated 1698 at the time): +13.
Costliest loss
Lost to Court McGee (rated 1590 at the time): -18.
Last 5 fights
1 win, 4 losses, -45 Elo in total.
Inactivity
Placed on 1627, not 1645: 18 points are held back after more than 18 months without a fight, until the next one.
Bernardo MagalhaesNot on the active ladder · 1472 Elo
Costliest loss
Lost to Henry Martinez (rated 1597 at the time): -14.
Last 2 fights
0 wins, 2 losses, -28 Elo in total.
Inactivity
Placed on 1382, not 1472: 90 points are held back after more than 18 months without a fight, until the next one.
Activity
Not on the active ladder: no rated fight in the last 24 months.

Every rated fight moves a rating by an amount set by the opponent's rating at the time, the result and how it ended. Places are counted among fighters active in the last 24 months. How the rating is calculated

Recorded fight totals

Tim MeansvsBernardo Magalhaes
Total strikes
98vs30
Sig. strikes
83vs28
Rev.
0vs1

Finishing profile

Tim MeansKO/TKO leads 61% of wins
Bernardo Magalhaesdecision leads 77% of wins

Common opponents

No clean shared-opponent match found in tracked pro MMA history.

Round stats

Tim MeansFight statsBernardo Magalhaes
98Total strikes30
0Takedowns0
0Sub. attempts0
0Rev.1
83Sig. strikes28
0Knockdowns0
0Control time0
98Total strikes30
0Takedowns0
0Sub. attempts0
0Rev.1
83Sig. strikes28
0Knockdowns0
0Control time0

Tim Means vs Bernardo Magalhaes is a completed Lightweight fight from UFC FIGHT NIGHT : SANCHEZ VS ELLENBERGER. Tim Means defeated Bernardo Magalhaes by Decision - Unanimous in round 1 at 00:05:00. Combat Edge lists the result, records, fight stats, Elo context, and links to both fighter profiles.

Tim Means vs Bernardo Magalhaes quick answers

Who won Tim Means vs Bernardo Magalhaes?

Tim Means won Tim Means vs Bernardo Magalhaes by Decision - Unanimous in round 1 at 00:05:00.

What event is Tim Means vs Bernardo Magalhaes on?

Tim Means vs Bernardo Magalhaes is listed on UFC FIGHT NIGHT : SANCHEZ VS ELLENBERGER.

What are the records for Tim Means vs Bernardo Magalhaes?

Tim Means enters with a 33-17-1 record and Bernardo Magalhaes enters with a 13-4-0 record.

What division is Tim Means vs Bernardo Magalhaes?

Tim Means vs Bernardo Magalhaes is listed as a Lightweight fight.

Comments

Loading comments…