AdvertisementRemove ads — go Premium
UFC FIGHT NIGHT : SHIELDS VS ELLENBERGER

Clay Harvison vs Seth Baczynski

Sep 17, 2011
ResultSeth Baczynski def. Clay Harvison by Submission · Round 1 · 00:01:12Fight analysis
DateSep 17, 2011
DivisionWelterweight
StatusCompleted
VenueNew Orleans Convention Center
BroadcastESPN+
L
Heavy Metal | 14-9-0Clay Harvison
W
The Polish Pistola | 21-16-0Seth Baczynski

Clay Harvison vs Seth Baczynski

Method :Submission
Round :1
Time :00:01:12
Time format :Pending
Referee :Pending
Details :Pending
Clay HarvisonHeavy Metal |14-9-0Clay Harvison vs Seth BaczynskiSeth BaczynskiThe Polish Pistola |21-16-0
usClay HarvisonHeavy Metal14-9-0Clay Harvisonus

Fight Overview

Round1
Time00:01:12
MethodSubmission
usSeth BaczynskiThe Polish Pistola21-16-0usSeth Baczynski
Combat Edge Intelligence

Fight Intelligence

Seth Baczynski won this fight by Submission in round 1 at 00:01:12. Seth Baczynski led more tracked fight-stat categories from the recorded round totals. Attempt-rate stats such as 1 of 4 takedowns require attempt fields from the legacy API before Combat Edge can calculate them accurately.

Compare Clay Harvison and Seth Baczynski across their careers →

Recent career Elo trajectory

Recent three-year Elo paths for both fighters. Ratings shown here are current career context; the event-specific prediction or verified result remains on this Fight page.

Clay HarvisonSeth Baczynski
155016002018201920202021

Result

Seth BaczynskiSubmission
MethodSubmission
Round1
Time00:01:12

Elo edge

Clay Harvison1525-22 last move
Seth Baczynski1554-12 last move

Why they are ranked here

Clay HarvisonNot on the active ladder · 1525 Elo
Biggest gain
Beat Ururahy Rodrigues (rated 1527 at the time): +19.
Costliest loss
Lost to Brandon Longano (rated 1500 at the time): -23.
Last 5 fights
1 win, 4 losses, -66 Elo in total.
Inactivity
Placed on 1435, not 1525: 90 points are held back after more than 18 months without a fight, until the next one.
Seth BaczynskiNot on the active ladder · 1554 Elo
Biggest gain
Beat Marvin Babe (rated 1448 at the time): +9.
Costliest loss
Lost to Alan Jouban (rated 1542 at the time): -19.
Last 5 fights
1 win, 4 losses, -45 Elo in total.
Inactivity
Placed on 1464, not 1554: 90 points are held back after more than 18 months without a fight, until the next one.

Every rated fight moves a rating by an amount set by the opponent's rating at the time, the result and how it ended. Places are counted among fighters active in the last 24 months. How the rating is calculated

Recorded fight totals

Clay HarvisonvsSeth Baczynski
Sig. strikes
12vs41
Total strikes
18vs45
Sub. attempts
0vs1
Knockdowns
0vs1

Finishing profile

Clay HarvisonKO/TKO leads 43% of wins
Seth Baczynskisubmission leads 52% of wins

Common opponents

No clean shared-opponent match found in tracked pro MMA history.

Round stats

Clay HarvisonFight statsSeth Baczynski
18Total strikes45
0Takedowns0
0Sub. attempts1
0Rev.0
12Sig. strikes41
0Knockdowns1
0Control time0
18Total strikes45
0Takedowns0
0Sub. attempts1
0Rev.0
12Sig. strikes41
0Knockdowns1
0Control time0
0Total strikes0
0Takedowns0
0Sub. attempts0
0Rev.0
0Sig. strikes0
0Knockdowns0
0Control time0

Clay Harvison vs Seth Baczynski is a completed Welterweight fight from UFC FIGHT NIGHT : SHIELDS VS ELLENBERGER. Seth Baczynski defeated Clay Harvison by Submission in round 1 at 00:01:12. Combat Edge lists the result, records, fight stats, Elo context, and links to both fighter profiles.

Clay Harvison vs Seth Baczynski quick answers

Who won Clay Harvison vs Seth Baczynski?

Seth Baczynski won Clay Harvison vs Seth Baczynski by Submission in round 1 at 00:01:12.

What event is Clay Harvison vs Seth Baczynski on?

Clay Harvison vs Seth Baczynski is listed on UFC FIGHT NIGHT : SHIELDS VS ELLENBERGER.

What are the records for Clay Harvison vs Seth Baczynski?

Clay Harvison enters with a 14-9-0 record and Seth Baczynski enters with a 21-16-0 record.

What division is Clay Harvison vs Seth Baczynski?

Clay Harvison vs Seth Baczynski is listed as a Welterweight fight.

Comments

Loading comments…