AdvertisementRemove ads — go Premium
UFC 239 : JONES VS SANTOS

Edmen Shahbazyan vs Jack Marshman

Jul 6, 2019
ResultEdmen Shahbazyan def. Jack Marshman by Submission · Round 1 · 1:12Fight analysis
DateJul 6, 2019
DivisionMiddleweight
StatusCompleted
VenueT-Mobile Arena
BroadcastPPV
W
The Golden Boy | 17-6-0Edmen Shahbazyan
L
The Hammer | 23-10-0Jack Marshman

Edmen Shahbazyan vs Jack Marshman

Method :Submission
Round :R1
Time :1:12
Time format :(5-5-5)
Referee :Marc Goddard
Details :Rear-naked choke
Edmen ShahbazyanThe Golden Boy |17-6-0Edmen Shahbazyan vs Jack MarshmanJack MarshmanThe Hammer |23-10-0
usEdmen ShahbazyanThe Golden Boy17-6-0Edmen Shahbazyanus

Fight Overview

RoundR1
Time1:12
MethodSubmission
gb-wlsJack MarshmanThe Hammer23-10-0gb-wlsJack Marshman
Combat Edge Intelligence

Fight Intelligence

Edmen Shahbazyan won this fight by Submission in round R1 at 1:12. Edmen Shahbazyan led more tracked fight-stat categories from the recorded round totals. Attempt-rate stats such as 1 of 4 takedowns require attempt fields from the legacy API before Combat Edge can calculate them accurately.

Compare Edmen Shahbazyan and Jack Marshman across their careers →

Recent career Elo trajectory

Recent three-year Elo paths for both fighters. Ratings shown here are current career context; the event-specific prediction or verified result remains on this Fight page.

Edmen ShahbazyanJack Marshman
160016501700175020192020202120222023202420252026

Result

Edmen ShahbazyanSubmission
MethodSubmission
RoundR1
Time1:12
Time format(5-5-5)
RefereeMarc Goddard
DetailsRear-naked choke
Elo swing-12Jack Marshman (1640 → 1628)

Elo edge

Edmen Shahbazyan1732+16 last move
Jack Marshman1620-8 last move

Why they are ranked here

Edmen Shahbazyan#26 of 254 active Middleweight fighters · 1732 Elo
Biggest gain
Beat André Muniz (rated 1718 at the time): +20.
Costliest loss
Lost to Anthony Hernandez (rated 1650 at the time): -22.
Last 5 fights
4 wins, 1 loss, +55 Elo in total.
Next places
2 points behind #25 Cezary Oleksiejczuk, 0 ahead of #27 Fabian Edwards.
Jack MarshmanNot on the active ladder · 1620 Elo
Biggest gain
Beat Magnus Cedenblad (rated 1674 at the time): +15.
Costliest loss
Lost to Antônio Carlos Júnior (rated 1600 at the time): -17.
Last 5 fights
1 win, 4 losses, -32 Elo in total.
Inactivity
Placed on 1530, not 1620: 90 points are held back after more than 18 months without a fight, until the next one.

Every rated fight moves a rating by an amount set by the opponent's rating at the time, the result and how it ended. Places are counted among fighters active in the last 24 months. How the rating is calculated

Recorded fight totals

Edmen ShahbazyanvsJack Marshman
Control time
0:33vs0:00
Total strikes
13vs0
Sig. strikes
13vs0
Takedowns
1vs0
Sub. attempts
1vs0

Finishing profile

Edmen ShahbazyanKO/TKO leads 76% of wins
Jack MarshmanKO/TKO leads 57% of wins

Common opponents

No clean shared-opponent match found in tracked pro MMA history.

Round stats

Edmen ShahbazyanFight statsJack Marshman
13Total strikes0
1Takedowns0
1Sub. attempts0
0Rev.0
13Sig. strikes0
0Knockdowns0
33Control time0
13Total strikes0
1Takedowns0
1Sub. attempts0
0Rev.0
13Sig. strikes0
0Knockdowns0
33Control time0

Edmen Shahbazyan vs Jack Marshman is a completed Middleweight fight from UFC 239 : JONES VS SANTOS. Edmen Shahbazyan defeated Jack Marshman by Submission in round R1 at 1:12. Combat Edge lists the result, records, fight stats, Elo context, and links to both fighter profiles.

Edmen Shahbazyan vs Jack Marshman quick answers

Who won Edmen Shahbazyan vs Jack Marshman?

Edmen Shahbazyan won Edmen Shahbazyan vs Jack Marshman by Submission in round R1 at 1:12.

What event is Edmen Shahbazyan vs Jack Marshman on?

Edmen Shahbazyan vs Jack Marshman is listed on UFC 239 : JONES VS SANTOS.

What are the records for Edmen Shahbazyan vs Jack Marshman?

Edmen Shahbazyan enters with a 17-6-0 record and Jack Marshman enters with a 23-10-0 record.

What division is Edmen Shahbazyan vs Jack Marshman?

Edmen Shahbazyan vs Jack Marshman is listed as a Middleweight fight.

Comments

Loading comments…