AdvertisementRemove ads — go Premium
UFC FIGHT NIGHT : VANZANT VS WATERSON

Paige VanZant vs Michelle Waterson-Gomez

Dec 18, 2016
ResultMichelle Waterson-Gomez def. Paige VanZant by SUB · Round 1 · 03:11Fight analysis
DateDec 18, 2016
StatusCompleted
VenueGolden 1 Center
BroadcastESPN+
L
12 Gauge | 8-5-0Paige VanZant
W
The Karate Hottie | 18-13-0Michelle Waterson-Gomez

Paige VanZant vs Michelle Waterson-Gomez

Method :SUB
Round :1
Time :03:11
Time format :Pending
Referee :Pending
Details :Pending
Paige VanZant12 Gauge |8-5-0Paige VanZant vs Michelle Waterson-GomezMichelle Waterson-GomezThe Karate Hottie |18-13-0
usPaige VanZant12 Gauge8-5-0Paige VanZantus

Fight Overview

Round1
Time03:11
MethodSUB
usMichelle Waterson-GomezThe Karate Hottie18-13-0usMichelle Waterson-Gomez
Combat Edge Intelligence

Fight Intelligence

Michelle Waterson-Gomez won this fight by SUB in round 1 at 03:11. Michelle Waterson-Gomez led more tracked fight-stat categories from the recorded round totals. Attempt-rate stats such as 1 of 4 takedowns require attempt fields from the legacy API before Combat Edge can calculate them accurately.

Compare Paige VanZant and Michelle Waterson-Gomez across their careers →

Recent career Elo trajectory

Recent three-year Elo paths for both fighters. Ratings shown here are current career context; the event-specific prediction or verified result remains on this Fight page.

Paige VanZantMichelle Waterson-Gomez
1600201920202021202220232024

Result

Michelle Waterson-GomezSUB
MethodSUB
Round1
Time03:11
Elo swing-24Paige VanZant (1619 → 1595)

Elo edge

Paige VanZant1574-16 last move
Michelle Waterson-Gomez1582-10 last move

Why they are ranked here

Paige VanZantNot on the active ladder · 1574 Elo
Biggest gain
Beat Kailin Curran (rated 1566 at the time): +32.
Costliest loss
Lost to Rose Namajunas (rated 1531 at the time): -30.
Last 5 fights
2 wins, 3 losses, -18 Elo in total.
Inactivity
Placed on 1484, not 1574: 90 points are held back after more than 18 months without a fight, until the next one.
Michelle Waterson-GomezNot on the active ladder · 1582 Elo
Biggest gain
Beat Karolina Kowalkiewicz (rated 1686 at the time): +18.
Costliest loss
Lost to Carla Esparza (rated 1619 at the time): -14.
Last 5 fights
0 wins, 5 losses, -54 Elo in total.
Inactivity
Placed on 1554, not 1582: 28 points are held back after more than 18 months without a fight, until the next one.

Every rated fight moves a rating by an amount set by the opponent's rating at the time, the result and how it ended. Places are counted among fighters active in the last 24 months. How the rating is calculated

Recorded fight totals

Paige VanZantvsMichelle Waterson-Gomez
Sig. strikes
5vs12
Total strikes
9vs13
Sub. attempts
0vs2
Takedowns
0vs1

Finishing profile

Paige VanZantsubmission leads 38% of wins
Michelle Waterson-Gomezsubmission leads 50% of wins

Round stats

Paige VanZantFight statsMichelle Waterson-Gomez
9Total strikes13
0Takedowns1
0Sub. attempts2
0Rev.0
5Sig. strikes12
0Knockdowns0
0Control time0
9Total strikes13
0Takedowns1
0Sub. attempts2
0Rev.0
5Sig. strikes12
0Knockdowns0
0Control time0

Paige VanZant vs Michelle Waterson-Gomez is a completed Women's Strawweight fight from UFC FIGHT NIGHT : VANZANT VS WATERSON. Michelle Waterson-Gomez defeated Paige VanZant by SUB in round 1 at 03:11. Combat Edge lists the result, records, fight stats, Elo context, and links to both fighter profiles.

Paige VanZant vs Michelle Waterson-Gomez quick answers

Who won Paige VanZant vs Michelle Waterson-Gomez?

Michelle Waterson-Gomez won Paige VanZant vs Michelle Waterson-Gomez by SUB in round 1 at 03:11.

What event is Paige VanZant vs Michelle Waterson-Gomez on?

Paige VanZant vs Michelle Waterson-Gomez is listed on UFC FIGHT NIGHT : VANZANT VS WATERSON.

What are the records for Paige VanZant vs Michelle Waterson-Gomez?

Paige VanZant enters with a 8-5-0 record and Michelle Waterson-Gomez enters with a 18-13-0 record.

What division is Paige VanZant vs Michelle Waterson-Gomez?

Paige VanZant vs Michelle Waterson-Gomez is listed as a Women's Strawweight fight.

Comments

Loading comments…